The Course of a
Particular
Today the leaves cry, hanging on branches swept by wind,
Yet the nothingness of winter becomes a little less.
It is still full of icy shades and shapen snow.
The leaves cry . . . One holds off and merely hears the cry.
It is a busy cry, concerning someone else.
And though one says that one is part of everything,
There is a conflict, there is a resistance involved;
And being part is an exertion that declines:
One feels the life of that which gives life as it is.
The leaves cry. It is not a cry of divine attention,
Nor the smoke-drift of puffed-out heroes, nor human cry.
It is the cry of leaves that do not transcend themselves,
In the absence of fantasia, without meaning more
Than they are in the final finding of the ear, in the thing
Itself, until, at last, the cry concerns no one at all.
– Wallace Stevens
***
Steven Wallace said...
“The poem means what the poem says, but what the poem says
depends on the poem's affirmations of nobility, than which nothing is more
difficult or more necessary. There is no element more conspicuously absent from
contemporary poetry than nobility.”
Affirmations of nobility, affirmations of what is worthwhile,
and by implication, the avoidance or excision of what is not.
For Homer, the worthiness and excellence of a life consisted
in strength, bravery and wit.
For Aristotle it was Arete
– his ethics of what it means to live the Good
Life – it is a mean, not an in-between, that sits between two extremes, of
too much and too little.
It is the practicality of choice which determines the wisdom
of a person.
Was it an aristocratic stance by Stevens or a search for meaning,
trying to hear that primordial voice (‘cry’) before the extinguishment, again,
into the undifferentiated where ‘no one (cares) at all’?
***
Joseph Carroll in Wallace
Stevens’ Supreme Fiction (1987):
‘The course of the poem is a meditation in which Stevens
inverts the visionary process through which he comes to a realization of
essential unity.’
From vision and ‘fantasia’ to alienation and back to ‘the
thing Itself’.
***
If God is dead, then it is Man who is the measure of Value.
And it is his Imagination that weaves new possibilities.
To relive us of that dreadful sense of our finitude, of our particular,
individual and unknown date with Death.
Post Nietzsche, the poet is, indeed, the arbiter of the
world.
“In an age of disbelief, or what is the same thing, in a
time that is largely humanistic, in one sense or another, it is for the poet to
supply the satisfactions of belief, in his measure and in his style”
***
Comments
Post a Comment